Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Huling Hirit: “try sticking a wooden dick on your mom’s photo” and all that jazz.

HULING HIRIT: “TRY STICKING A WOODEN DICK ON YOUR MOM'S PHOTO” AND ALL THAT JAZZ.





SABI NILA, oo nasa Konstitusyon raw ang “FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.” Pero SOBRA raw yung ginawa ni Mideo Cruz.




HINDI NA nya ni-respeto ang KATOLISISMO.




SIGE, SABIHIN na nating hindi si HESUKRISTO ang nilagyan niya ng ari sa mukha...NANAY mo na lang.... Hindi ba sobrang bastos pa rin?




PERO TEKA. Hindi ba delikadong naka-frame ang debate natin sa isyu ng “RESPETO” at “PAMBABASTOS”?




EXAMPLE. ITO ba nakakabastos? SERBIS. Gawa yan ni BRILLIANTE MENDOZA, Best Director sa 62nd CANNES Film Festival]




ITO, HINDI ba OFFENSIVE sa KATOLISISMO?




TANONG NI JEFF CRISOSTOMO, pambabastos ba kay BUDDHA ang paglagay sa kanya ng SHADES?




E ANG paggamit ng T’NALAK na sagrado sa mga T’BOLI bilang PUNDA NG UNAN o TABLE CLOTH?




O SIMPLENG pagtawag sa NANAY ng iba ng “PUTA”?




HINDI KO alam kung nabalitaan n’yo to, pero noong 2006, nagkaroon ng MALAKING ISYU sa US nang mag-picket sa libing ni  MATTHEW SNYDER ang ilang miyembro ng Westboro Baptist Church.
Isang sundalong NASAWI SA IRAQ si Matthew Snyder. Sa kanyang libing, may dala dalang mga banner na may nakasulat na “THANK GOD FOR DEAD SOLDIERS”, “YOU'RE GOING TO HELL”, at “GOD HATES YOU” yung mga nag-picket.



NAGKAROON NG kasuhan. Pero sa huli, sabi ng US Supreme Court, saklaw ng “free speech” yung mga picket na yun. Ito ang sabi nila:
“[S]peech on public issues occupies the highest rung of the hierarchy of First Amendment values and is entitled to SPECIAL PROTECTION. Although the boundaries of what constitutes speech on matters of public concern are not well defined, this Court has said that speech is of public concern when it can be fairly considered as relating to ANY MATTER OF POLITICAL, SOCIAL, OR OTHER CONCERN TO THE COMMUNITY, or when it is a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public.
"A statement’s arguably INAPPROPRIATE OR CONTROVERSIAL CHARACTER . . . IS IRRELEVANT to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern.
"The special protection afforded to what Westboro said, in the whole context of how and where it chose to say it, CANNOT BE OVERCOME BY A JURY FINDING THAT THE PICKETING WAS "OUTRAGEOUS" for purposes of applying the state law tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. That would pose too great a danger that the jury would punish Westboro for its views on matters of public concern." 
[http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-751.pdf]



PARA WALA NANG MA-OFFEND, ganito na lang kaya gawin natin sa lahat ng religious figures: nasa likod ng itim na box na may nakasulat na CENSORED tulad ng ginawa nila kay MUHAMMAD sa SOUTH PARK 201. [Kung di mo 'to alam, check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/201_(South_Park) http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s14e06-201]




OH WELL. Manood na lang tayo ng PLANET OF THE APES...bago pa ito ipa-ban ni ATTY. JO IMBONG. Sabi nya sa twitter [fake account at ngayo’y SUSPENDIDO]:
“I have asked the MTRCB to ban the movie Rise of the Planet of the Apes because it leads us to believe that evolution is possible. It is not!”



No comments:

Post a Comment